Thought I'd share!Īccording to some incel/blackpill mantra I've read this book does in fact seem to fit that category/subject matter very closely. It sounds like she's saying that prettier women are the best manipulators, whereas less pretty women must be more "independent" (work, build her life from scratch, support herself, or at least not have presumable privilege that comes with being attractive and female?). I don't disagree with the main premise behind the book, but I would probably disagree with some of Esther's views on women/females overall. This is interesting as this book is genuinely considered "anti-feminist" or something of that tone, although I think most of us here would disagree with at least some of its assertions. Has a particular interest in a certain career".Has to work because he can’t manage to sustain her.Click to expand."She categorized emancipated females as follows:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |